Skip to content

Economy Brainstorm

Raw ideas from early design discussion. Nothing here is decided. This page captures directions worth exploring further.

Goal

Design an economy that makes every holding feel distinct, rewards strategic thinking over pure expansion, and creates meaningful interdependencies between holdings, players, and stellar objects.

Core Problem

A flat economy where every object produces the same resources at the same rates removes strategic depth. Every holding becomes interchangeable. The goal is asymmetry — objects, holdings, and players should feel economically distinct.

Working Directions

Sectors

The term "buildings" does not fit a planetary scale. "Sectors" better describes what is actually happening — an entire region of a planet or moon committed to a function.

Two kinds of sectors are under consideration:

Upgradable sectors develop over time. Each level costs more and produces more. They always produce or enable something tangible — resources, ships, population capacity. Examples: extraction, processing, shipyard, population district.

One-time sectors are built once and unlock something. They have no levels. Examples: a research center that unlocks a production chain, an administration building that opens specialist slots, a settlement foundation that enables holding tier upgrades.

One-time sectors likely unlock:

  • holding capabilities (e.g. specialist slots, production chains)
  • holding tier transitions — upgrading a claim to a frontier, or a frontier to a colony, requires building a specific one-time sector and investing resources. It is not a simple click.

Sector Slot Limits

Each stellar object has a finite number of sector slots. You cannot build unlimited sectors on a single object.

Slot count varies by object type. Planets have more slots than moons. Moons have more than asteroid belts.

Slots may also have their own Slot Class. That means two objects with the same number of slots can still feel very different if one gives better sector output than the other.

This is a possible replacement for more complicated spatial or grid-based sector planning. The holding stays simple — a count of available slots — but those slots are not all equally attractive.

Technology can increase the slot limit of an object, allowing further development over time.

Technology might also improve slot classes or upgrade one slot into a stronger class, without changing how much it costs to use that slot.

This forces specialization. A player must choose which sectors to prioritize on each holding.

Stellar Object Asymmetry

Objects are not interchangeable. Their type determines what resources can exist there at all, not just how much.

Some resources simply cannot occur on certain object types. A gas giant will never yield structural materials. A rocky moon will never yield certain volatiles. Occurrence ratings apply within the possible set for that object type.

This means:

  • object type is strategically meaningful from the moment of discovery
  • no object can be developed into a general-purpose economic hub
  • players must build networks of specialized holdings rather than self-sufficient ones

Small objects can have extreme specialization — very high occurrence for one specific resource — and outperform a large planet for that resource while being useless for everything else. Large objects offer breadth but rarely excel at any single resource.

Trade and Flow

Resources do not move on their own. Transport has a cost and a capacity limit.

A highly developed extraction holding that cannot ship its output is economically useless. Logistics infrastructure is a real constraint, not an afterthought.

Blockading a trade route is a form of economic warfare. An attacker does not need to destroy a holding to hurt it — cutting its supply lines is enough.

Player-to-player trade routes create commerce and political tension between empires.

Demand

Holdings are not only producers. They consume resources to function and grow.

A colony that does not receive necessary materials stagnates or declines. Fleet upkeep consumes resources continuously. A large fleet is an ongoing economic drain.

This means production is not just "fill a storage bucket" — it is a balance between output and consumption across the empire.

Specialists

Specialists are a scarce resource. There are never enough to cover every holding.

Assigning a specialist to a holding boosts its performance in specific sectors. The choice of where to assign them is a meaningful strategic decision.

Specialists might degrade or burn out over time, creating ongoing management pressure rather than a one-time placement decision.

Population

Population produces labor. Labor enables sector output. Without sufficient population a holding cannot operate at full capacity regardless of sector level.

Population grows slowly, migrates between holdings, and flees conflict. Over-developing a holding relative to its population creates diminishing returns or instability.

Research

Research unlocks efficiency improvements rather than new sector types. Better extraction methods increase output per sector level. Advanced engineering raises sector slot limits on objects or improves slot-class output on weaker sites.

This creates a technology gap between players that compounds over time and gives a meaningful purpose to research investment beyond unlocking units.

Economic Vulnerability

Highly specialized empires are efficient but fragile. A supply chain that depends on a single processing holding collapses if that holding is raided, blockaded, or captured.

This is intentional. Economic depth means economic risk. Players who build tightly integrated supply chains gain efficiency and expose themselves to cascading failures.

Processing and Logistics Positioning

Some objects may be better suited to processing or logistics roles based on their position in a system rather than their resource composition. An object at a strategic location might have low extraction value but high value as a waypoint or redistribution hub.

This idea is not yet fully framed.

Open Questions

  • Which object types can host which resource types? This needs a full compatibility matrix.
  • What are the exact slot counts and Slot Class distributions per object type, and by how much does technology increase or improve them?
  • How do specialist slots work — are they tied to a specific one-time sector, or to holding tier?
  • What resources do colonies, frontiers, and fleets consume? Is consumption tied to sector count, population, or both?
  • How is processing modelled — as a sector type, a one-time unlock, a research prerequisite, or a combination?
  • How is the logistics positioning idea framed in player-facing terms?